Python 3.11+
The examples use the standard Python syntax and containers supported by the browser Judge; the Choose / Explore / Unchoose invariant is independent of a minor Python release.
Verify in Python docs(opens in a new tab)Build candidates recursively, prune invalid states, and undo each choice during backtracking. Learn its decision rule, maintained state, Python cost model, and transfer from a focused drill to a full Interview Problem.
Recognize it when
Consider Choose / Explore / Unchoose when the prompt's constraints and required operations match this shape: Build candidates recursively, prune invalid states, and undo each choice during backtracking.

Sign in to save your code and progress across devices. The lesson and problem statement remain public.
The current path is shared mutable state describing decisions from root to the active search node. Sibling branches must begin from the same restored prefix.
Apply exactly one choice and update all state it owns before recursion. Choice order controls output order but should not change which valid solutions exist.
def choice_lifecycle(choices):
path=[]; events=[]
for choice in choices:
path.append(choice); events.append(["choose",path.copy()]); events.append(["undo",path.copy()]); path.pop()
return eventsImplement choice_lifecycle(choices). Return [choose,path] and [undo,path] for one decision depth.
Loading interactive editor.If it does not appear, the reference and starter code remain readable.Reload editor
After the recursive call, reverse every mutation from the choice—path append, used flag, counts, or board cell. Early returns need the same cleanup unless success intentionally terminates the entire search.
def permutations(values):
result=[]; path=[]; used=[False]*len(values)
def search():
if len(path)==len(values): result.append(path.copy()); return
for index,value in enumerate(values):
if used[index]: continue
used[index]=True; path.append(value); search(); path.pop(); used[index]=False
search(); return resultImplement permutations(values). Return all permutations in choice order without mutating values.
Loading interactive editor.If it does not appear, the reference and starter code remain readable.Reload editor
Append a copy when recording a solution; appending the shared path itself makes every result reflect later mutations. Avoid copying at every internal node unless the simpler immutable-state approach is worth its cost.
Say: “The path is the current partial candidate. I choose, explore, and undo so the next sibling sees an identical prefix.” Then state terminal condition, duplicate policy, branching factor, maximum depth, and output-copy cost.
Python 3.11+
The examples use the standard Python syntax and containers supported by the browser Judge; the Choose / Explore / Unchoose invariant is independent of a minor Python release.
Verify in Python docs(opens in a new tab)Interview bounds depend on the stated representation, input model, and real Python operations.
| Operation | Average | Worst | Interview note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Choose / Explore / Unchoose decision loop | O(c * (p + 1)) | O(c * (p + 1)) | Each backtracking branch needs a path state that includes one choice but does not leak that choice into sibling branches. Before expanding each choice, path equals the original caller-owned prefix; every emitted candidate contains exactly one additional element. |
O(c * (p + 1)) for independent candidates for the focused Complete One Backtracking Frame implementation.
These are the mistakes most likely to survive a happy-path example and fail a boundary case.
Applying the pattern without proving its ordering, monotonicity, or window invariant can silently miss valid candidates.
Prevent it: Write the decision rule beside the loop and verify it against Complete One Backtracking Frame before optimizing.
Avoid
def expand_backtracking_frame(path, choices):
passUse instead
def expand_backtracking_frame(path, choices):
candidates = []
for choice in choices:
path.append(choice)
candidates.append(path.copy())
path.pop()
return candidatesWhere you will hit this: Complete One Backtracking Frame(opens in a new tab)
Never undoes the choice and stores the same mutable path object for every sibling candidate.
Prevent it: Use the public tests and preserve this state: The mutable path represents exactly the choices on the current recursion stack.
Avoid
def expand_backtracking_frame(path, choices):
candidates = []
for choice in choices:
path.append(choice)
candidates.append(path)
return candidatesUse instead
def expand_backtracking_frame(path, choices):
candidates = []
for choice in choices:
path.append(choice)
candidates.append(path.copy())
path.pop()
return candidatesWhere you will hit this: Complete One Backtracking Frame(opens in a new tab)
Python slicing, copying, membership in lists, or repeated sorting inside the loop can invalidate the intended complexity.
Prevent it: Count every slice, copy, sort, membership check, and container update before claiming O(c * (p + 1)).
Avoid
def expand_backtracking_frame(path, choices):
candidates = []
for choice in choices:
path.append(choice)
candidates.append(path)
return candidatesUse instead
def expand_backtracking_frame(path, choices):
candidates = []
for choice in choices:
path.append(choice)
candidates.append(path.copy())
path.pop()
return candidatesWhere you will hit this: Path Sum II(opens in a new tab)
Official Python documentation supports language behavior. Canonical problem pages provide additional practice context.
python-docs · checked 2026-07-27
python-docs · checked 2026-07-27